Editorial

Even in Victory, Republicans Should Listen to Their Opponents

In the wake of Donald Trump’s election, many people have discussed Democrats’ mistakes — from their being “out of touch” and insulting, to their focusing too much on Trump, to Biden’s “arrogance” in running again. It’s good for political parties to ask tough questions about how their approach may be driving people away and how they can better reach and sway the American people.

As Trump is inaugurated and Republicans continue to celebrate their victory, will they be brave enough to ask themselves similar questions?

No matter the election results, what hasn’t changed is that we’re deeply divided — almost down the middle, in terms of voters. If Republicans fail to reflect on those questions, in a few years they risk finding themselves back where they were in 2020: out of power and mired in resentment. If that happens, will they blame “the establishment” and other external forces for their losses? Or will they consider how their rhetoric and approaches may have alienated Americans and led to their own setbacks?

Much of the recent toxicity centers around Trump. Many Americans see Trump as a uniquely irresponsible and dangerous figure — and that perception obviously won’t go away with his return to power. Republicans should think deeply about these concerns — and avoid the urge to denigrate and mock them.

To be clear, this is not an anti-Trump piece; it’s about the need to understand and respect our fellow Americans’ concerns. That is something we often ask people to do, regardless of their political beliefs or partisanship. When we fail to do those things, we’ll find that we deepen divisions and amplify contempt.

For example, consider the distrust of elections fostered by Trump and other Republicans after Trump’s 2020 loss. Many embraced the narrative that the election was “stolen” by Democrats despite a lack of substantial evidence. Trump’s victory in 2024 undermines those claims.

As Mark Antonio Wright sarcastically put it in National Review: “If Democrats stole it in 2020, why didn’t they steal it this time?” Leaning into the sarcasm, Wright went on to write: “There’s just no way that Donald Trump and his minions in 2020 would have stooped to lying to the American people in order to assuage the bruised ego of a single man. There’s no way that grifters in right-wing media would have amplified that message in an effort to deliver fan service to their audiences. And there’s just no way that so many election truthers on the right would have bought Trump’s 2020 lies hook, line, and sinker.”

Regardless of your views of Trump or the 2020 election, hopefully you can see that Trump’s recent win highlights the illogical nature of the more dark and paranoid narratives about powerful anti-Trump forces working behind-the-scenes to rig our elections.

Pessimistic thinking happens across the political spectrum, and our emotional divides make such negativity more likely. Regardless of how they view this topic and regardless of objections that “Democrats have done it, too,” Republicans should be able to see why so many Americans were seriously concerned about such behaviors. Promoting a narrative where one’s opponents are stealing elections amplifies fears and can fuel violence; at a large enough scale, it can threaten a country’s stability. That’s why concerns that “democracy is being threatened” resonated so deeply for many Americans.

Of course, not all responses to such concerns are equally good and helpful. Some efforts to “save democracy” can easily be criticized as partisan and polarizing — like the attempt to remove Trump from the ballot. The partisan nature of some of those efforts can make it easy for Republicans to view all concerns about Trump’s actions as unreasonable — as either having political motivations or being overblown.

That is just how conflict works: our hostility will lead us to filter for and find evidence for why our opponents’ concerns don’t matter — why they’re laughable and worthy of mockery. And in a huge country like ours, finding examples of behaviors that strike us as unreasonable and outlandish will always be easy.

But when political parties focus on mocking opponents’ concerns and fail to take Americans’ grievances seriously, there is a price to pay — just ask the Democrats who are soul searching after their recent losses.

If Republicans want to lower political toxicity, or even ensure long-term success, they must avoid gloating and indulging in “we won, so deal with it” attitudes. Instead, they should take this opportunity to acknowledge the valid concerns of those who view Trump’s behavior and rhetoric as dangerous. Understanding those views doesn’t require agreeing with them — it simply requires empathy and respect.

They should also examine their views about Democrats as a group to determine if they are overly pessimistic. For example, claiming that Democratic stances on immigration are motivated by a desire to win elections is as reductive and insulting as the claim that Republican stances on immigration are driven by racism. All of us must resist the temptation to reach for worst-case assumptions and to “mind-read” our opponents’ hidden intentions: these tendencies only deepen mistrust and hostility.

Winning an election will never guarantee permanent victory — and speaking as if it can will only amplify tensions. Trying to understand and speak to our opponents’ concerns is not weakness; it is how we build a healthier, stronger country and avoid worst-case outcomes. It also happens to be how we can better advocate for our goals.

Pearce Godwin is politically conservative and the founder of the Listen First Project. In a piece advising Republicans to work to reduce toxicity, he writes: “As we vigorously contest visions, values, and policies, never surrendering our convictions, we can uphold a basic respect for the humanity of our opponents and all fellow Americans.”

If more leaders and activists — Democrats and Republicans — can rise to that challenge, we may find a way to bridge the toxic divides that threaten our nation. If we can’t, we risk remaining trapped in a dangerous, self-reinforcing cycle of mutual hostility and contempt. The choice is ours to make.

Want to help overcome our toxic divides? Join the Builders Movement.

Keep Reading

Comic-style illustration of a man in a suit reading a newspaper intently on a red train, with other passengers visible in the background.
Editorial
Editorial

Angry at "the Media"? 4 Reasons To Cut Them Some Slack

Man in a suit climbing a ladder out of a cracked ground hole, smiling and looking upwards against a yellow background.
Editorial
Editorial

To Solve America’s Problems, We Need Bridges — and Ladders

Illustration of a hand touching water, creating ripples, with the U.S. flag in the background.
Editorial
Editorial

2025 and Beyond: Why Reflection Is Key to Reducing Political Toxicity

Scroll To Top