The Dangerous Myth of the Cynical Genius

Pop culture has sold us the story of the hyper-intelligent cynic. Our favorite fiction is overflowing with brilliant-but-bitter characters like Sherlock Holmes (emotionally unavailable Victorian cokehead), Dr. House (sarcastic Vicodin cryptid), and Rick Sanchez (space nihilist with a lab coat and a habitual hangover). Meanwhile, the optimistic and happy-go-lucky characters—the Forrest Gumps and the Spongebobs—are lovable but we don’t really take them seriously. 

Being hopeful is for the simple-minded. Real brilliance means sighing loudly while explaining why nothing matters. 

Except… actual science disagrees. 

Optimism is basically a superpower

A 2019 study surveyed around 200,000 people across 30 countries. They found that most people think cynics are more intelligent, but those same cynics actually performed worse on cognitive and academic tasks. 

Researchers found cynics were also more easily manipulated than optimists. This is because the cynic approaches a social situation assuming he already knows everything he needs to know about the other person. The optimist, on the other hand, reads people and looks for signs.

So, as it turns out, your friend who insists that “you can’t trust anyone these days” might not be operating on some higher intellectual plane. He might just be tired, socially anxious, and bad at recognizing patterns. 

This phenomenon even has a name: “The Cynical Genius Illusion.”

So why do we think cynicism makes you smart?

Scientists call it a negativity bias. Basically, our brains are hardwired to latch onto bad news like a raccoon with a half-eaten McRib. This bias is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation that helped our ancestors survive by making them more alert to potential threats. 

For your great, great, great, (multiply “great” by 1,000) grandfather, this gene kept him alive long enough to pass it down to you. For you, it’s basically a voice in your head that says, “Whoa, that guy wearing a beanie in 90-degree weather just said everything’s doomed—he must be onto something.” 

Debunking the myths of cynicism

Stanford psychologist and Movement Partner Dr. Jamil Zaki highlights two myths about cynicism that make it such a hard habit to kick.

The first myth is that cynicism protects you. Cynicism feels like a shield. If you don’t trust anyone, they can’t hurt you. But this isn’t protection—it’s isolation. Zaki compares it to folding every poker hand before the cards are even dealt. You don’t lose, but you don’t win, either.

Sure, trust makes you vulnerable. But it’s also how you make friends, fall in love, build companies, create movements. The most meaningful things in life all require some leap of faith.

The second myth Zaki points out is the belief that cynicism is moral.

Some argue that optimism is a luxury. That only the privileged can afford to assume the best about people. That to hope is to ignore the harsh realities of the world.

But hope isn’t about ignoring injustice. It’s about refusing to let injustice define what’s possible. Cynicism says nothing can change. Hope says maybe it can. Only the latter leads to action.

Zaki highlights that cynics vote less, protest less, and support authoritarian leaders more. Why? Because they’ve given up on each other. And when you stop believing in people, you start believing in strongmen who promise to do the believing for you.

Overcoming your cynicism

But Alex, you may be saying, how am I supposed to be optimistic about the world right now? Just look at *gestures wildly at everything*

No one’s saying you should see the world as a magical twee fairy land where people frolick to work and use butterfly kisses as currency. Nor am I suggesting you give your bank info to a guy in a trench coat who says he’s a time traveler. Blind trust is dangerous. But so is blind distrust.

The best approach isn’t cynicism or naivete. It’s hopeful skepticism. Zaki describes hopeful skepticism as a mindset that allows us to engage with the world without being destroyed by it.

Hopeful skepticism is the mindset of someone who asks questions without giving up on people. It’s a way of moving through the world that combines careful thinking with an open heart.

Unlike blind trust, hopeful skepticism doesn’t assume the best of everyone, no matter what. And unlike cynicism, it doesn’t assume the worst either. It’s a middle path—one that acknowledges people can lie, disappoint, or cause harm, but also that people are capable of kindness, growth, and change.

So next time you’re tempted to sigh loudly and say, “People are the worst,” try something radical: believe people might be better than you think. It could be the smartest move you make.

—Alex Buscemi (abuscemi@buildersmovement.org)

We’re a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization on a mission to help overcome our most toxic divides. Sign up for weekly inspiration, tools, and ways to take action to overcome us-vs.-them mindsets and solve our toughest problems together.